For You to Read
属于您的小说阅读网站
巴黎圣母院英文版 - BOOK FIFTH CHAPTER II.THIS WILL KILL THAT. Page 2
繁体
恢复默认
返回目录【键盘操作】左右光标键:上下章节;回车键:目录;双击鼠标:停止/启动自动滚动;滚动时上下光标键调节滚动速度。
  And when one observes that this mode of expression is not only the most conservative, but also the most simple, the most convenient, the most practicable for all; when one reflects that it does not drag after it bulky baggage, and does not set in motion a heavy apparatus; when one compares thought forced, in order to transform itself into an edifice, to put in motion four or five other arts and tons of gold, a whole mountain of stones, a whole forest of timber-work, a whole nation of workmen; when one compares it to the thought which becomes a book, and for which a little paper, a little ink, and a pen suffice,--how can one be surprised that human intelligence should have quitted architecture for printing? Cut the primitive bed of a river abruptly with a canal hollowed out below its level, and the river will desert its bed.Behold how, beginning with the discovery of printing, architecture withers away little by little, becomes lifeless and bare.How one feels the water sinking, the sap departing, the thought of the times and of the people withdrawing from it!The chill is almost imperceptible in the fifteenth century; the press is, as yet, too weak, and, at the most, draws from powerful architecture a superabundance of life.But practically beginning with the sixteenth century, the malady of architecture is visible; it is no longer the expression of society; it becomes classic art in a miserable manner; from being Gallic, European, indigenous, it becomes Greek and Roman; from being true and modern, it becomes pseudo-classic.It is this decadence which is called the Renaissance.A magnificent decadence, however, for the ancient Gothic genius, that sun which sets behind the gigantic press of Mayence, still penetrates for a while longer with its rays that whole hybrid pile of Latin arcades and Corinthian columns.It is that setting sun which we mistake for the dawn.Nevertheless, from the moment when architecture is no longer anything but an art like any other; as soon as it is no longer the total art, the sovereign art, the tyrant art,--it has no longer the power to retain the other arts.So they emancipate themselves, break the yoke of the architect, and take themselves off, each one in its own direction.Each one of them gains by this divorce.Isolation aggrandizes everything. Sculpture becomes statuary, the image trade becomes painting, the canon becomes music.One would pronounce it an empire dismembered at the death of its Alexander, and whose provinces become kingdoms.Hence Raphael, Michael Angelo, Jean Goujon, palestrina, those splendors of the dazzling sixteenth century.Thought emancipates itself in all directions at the same time as the arts.The arch-heretics of the Middle Ages had already made large incisions into Catholicism.The sixteenth century breaks religious unity.Before the invention of printing, reform would have been merely a schism; printing converted it into a revolution.Take away the press; heresy is enervated. Whether it be providence or Fate, Gutenburg is the precursor of Luther.Nevertheless, when the sun of the Middle Ages is completely set, when the Gothic genius is forever extinct upon the horizon, architecture grows dim, loses its color, becomes more and more effaced.The printed book, the gnawing worm of the edifice, sucks and devours it.It becomes bare, denuded of its foliage, and grows visibly emaciated.It is petty, it is poor, it is nothing.It no longer expresses anything, not even the memory of the art of another time.Reduced to itself, abandoned by the other arts, because human thought is abandoning it, it summons bunglers in place of artists.Glass replaces the painted windows.The stone-cutter succeeds the sculptor. Farewell all sap, all originality, all life, all intelligence. It drags along, a lamentable workshop mendicant, from copy to copy.Michael Angelo, who, no doubt, felt even in the sixteenth century that it was dying, had a last idea, an idea of despair.That Titan of art piled the pantheon on the parthenon, and made Saint-peter's at Rome.A great work, which deserved to remain unique, the last originality of architecture, the signature of a giant artist at the bottom of the colossal register of stone which was closed forever.With Michael Angelo dead, what does this miserable architecture, which survived itself in the state of a spectre, do?It takes Saint-peter in Rome, copies it and parodies it.It is a mania. It is a pity.Each century has its Saint-peter's of Rome; in the seventeenth century, the Val-de-Grace; in the eighteenth, Sainte-Geneviève.Each country has its Saint-peter's of Rome.London has one; petersburg has another; paris has two or three.The insignificant testament, the last dotage of a decrepit grand art falling back into infancy before it dies.If, in place of the characteristic monuments which we have just described, we examine the general aspect of art from the sixteenth to the eighteenth century, we notice the same phenomena of decay and phthisis.Beginning with Fran?ois II., the architectural form of the edifice effaces itself more and more, and allows the geometrical form, like the bony structure of an emaciated invalid, to become prominent.The fine lines of art give way to the cold and inexorable lines of geometry.An edifice is no longer an edifice; it is a polyhedron.Meanwhile, architecture is tormented in her struggles to conceal this nudity.Look at the Greek pediment inscribed upon the Roman pediment, and vice versa.It is still the pantheon on the parthenon: Saint-peter's of Rome.Here are the brick houses of Henri IV., with their stone corners; the place Royale, the place Dauphine.Here are the churches of Louis XIII., heavy, squat, thickset, crowded together, loaded with a dome like a hump.Here is the Mazarin architecture, the wretched Italian pasticcio of the Four Nations. Here are the palaces of Louis XIV., long barracks for courtiers, stiff, cold, tiresome.Here, finally, is Louis XV., with chiccory leaves and vermicelli, and all the warts, and all the fungi, which disfigure that decrepit, toothless, and coquettish old architecture.From Fran?ois II. to Louis XV., the evil has increased in geometrical progression.Art has no longer anything but skin upon its bones.It is miserably perishing.Meanwhile what becomes of printing?All the life which is leaving architecture comes to it.In proportion as architecture ebbs, printing swells and grows.That capital of forces which human thought had been expending in edifices, it henceforth expends in books.Thus, from the sixteenth century onward, the press, raised to the level of decaying architecture, contends with it and kills it.In the seventeenth century it is already sufficiently the sovereign, sufficiently triumphant, sufficiently established in its victory, to give to the world the feast of a great literary century.In the eighteenth, having reposed for a long time at the Court of Louis XIV., it seizes again the old sword of Luther, puts it into the hand of Voltaire, and rushes impetuously to the attack of that ancient Europe, whose architectural expression it has already killed.At the moment when the eighteenth century comes to an end, it has destroyed everything. In the nineteenth, it begins to reconstruct.Now, we ask, which of the three arts has really represented human thought for the last three centuries? which translates it? which expresses not only its literary and scholastic vagaries, but its vast, profound, universal movement? which constantly superposes itself, without a break, without a gap, upon the human race, which walks a monster with a thousand legs?--Architecture or printing?It is printing.Let the reader make no mistake; architecture is dead; irretrievably slain by the printed book,--slain because it endures for a shorter time,--slain because it costs more.Every cathedral represents millions.Let the reader now imagine what an investment of funds it would require to rewrite the architectural book; to cause thousands of edifices to swarm once more upon the soil; to return to those epochs when the throng of monuments was such, according to the statement of an eye witness, "that one would have said that the world in shaking itself, had cast off its old garments in order to cover itself with a white vesture of churches." ~Erat enim ut si mundus, ipse excutiendo semet, rejecta vetustate, candida ecclesiarum vestem indueret~.(GLABER RADOLpHUS.)A book is so soon made, costs so little, and can go so far! How can it surprise us that all human thought flows in this channel?This does not mean that architecture will not still have a fine monument, an isolated masterpiece, here and there.We may still have from time to time, under the reign of printing, a column made I suppose, by a whole army from melted cannon, as we had under the reign of architecture, Iliads and Romanceros, Mahabahrata, and Nibelungen Lieds, made by a whole people, with rhapsodies piled up and melted together.The great accident of an architect of genius may happen in the twentieth century, like that of Dante in the thirteenth.But architecture will no longer be the social art, the collective art, the dominating art.The grand poem, the grand edifice, the grand work of humanity will no longer be built: it will be printed.And henceforth, if architecture should arise again accidentally, it will no longer be mistress.It will be subservient to the law of literature, which formerly received the law from it.The respective positions of the two arts will be inverted.It is certain that in architectural epochs, the poems, rare it is true, resemble the monuments.In India, Vyasa is branching, strange, impenetrable as a pagoda.In Egyptian Orient, poetry has like the edifices, grandeur and tranquillity of line; in antique Greece, beauty, serenity, calm; in Christian Europe, the Catholic majesty, the popular naivete, the rich and luxuriant vegetation of an epoch of renewal. The Bible resembles the pyramids; the Iliad, the parthenon; Homer, phidias.Dante in the thirteenth century is the last Romanesque church; Shakespeare in the sixteenth, the last Gothic cathedral.Thus, to sum up what we have hitherto said, in a fashion which is necessarily incomplete and mutilated, the human race has two books, two registers, two testaments: masonry and printing; the Bible of stone and the Bible of paper.No doubt, when one contemplates these two Bibles, laid so broadly open in the centuries, it is permissible to regret the visible majesty of the writing of granite, those gigantic alphabets formulated in colonnades, in pylons, in obelisks, those sorts of human mountains which cover the world and the past, from the pyramid to the bell tower, from Cheops to Strasburg. The past must be reread upon these pages of marble.This book, written by architecture, must be admired and perused incessantly; but the grandeur of the edifice which printing erects in its turn must not be denied.That edifice is colossal.Some compiler of statistics has calculated, that if all the volumes which have issued from the press since Gutenberg's day were to be piled one upon another, they would fill the space between the earth and the moon; but it is not that sort of grandeur of which we wished to speak.Nevertheless, when one tries to collect in one's mind a comprehensive image of the total products of printing down to our own days, does not that total appear to us like an immense construction, resting upon the entire world, at which humanity toils without relaxation, and whose monstrous crest is lost in the profound mists of the future?It is the anthill of intelligence.It is the hive whither come all imaginations, those golden bees, with their honey.The edifice has a thousand stories.Here and there one beholds on its staircases the gloomy caverns of science which pierce its interior.Everywhere upon its surface, art causes its arabesques, rosettes, and laces to thrive luxuriantly before the eyes.There, every individual work, however capricious and isolated it may seem, has its place and its projection. Harmony results from the whole.From the cathedral of Shakespeare to the mosque of Byron, a thousand tiny bell towers are piled pell-mell above this metropolis of universal thought.At its base are written some ancient titles of humanity which architecture had not registered.To the left of the entrance has been fixed the ancient bas-relief, in white marble, of Homer; to the right, the polyglot Bible rears its seven heads.The hydra of the Romancero and some other hybrid forms, the Vedas and the Nibelungen bristle further on.Nevertheless, the prodigious edifice still remains incomplete. The press, that giant machine, which incessantly pumps all the intellectual sap of society, belches forth without pause fresh materials for its work.The whole human race is on the scaffoldings.Each mind is a mason.The humblest fills his hole, or places his stone.Retif dè le Bretonne brings his hod of plaster.Every day a new course rises.Independently of the original and individual contribution of each writer, there are collective contingents.The eighteenth century gives the _Encyclopedia_, the revolution gives the _Moniteur_.Assuredly, it is a construction which increases and piles up in endless spirals; there also are confusion of tongues, incessant activity, indefatigable labor, eager competition of all humanity, refuge promised to intelligence, a new Flood against an overflow of barbarians.It is the second tower of Babel of the human race.
或许您还会喜欢:
涨潮时节
作者:佚名
章节:36 人气:0
摘要:每个俱乐部都有个烦人的家伙,“加冕俱乐部”也不例外。尽管外面正有敌机来袭击,俱乐部里的气氛却一如既往。曾经远渡重洋到过印度的波特少校扯扯手上的报纸,清清喉咙。大家都赶快躲开他的眼光,可是没有用。“《泰晤士报》上登了戈登-柯罗穗的讣闻,”他说,“当然说得很含蓄——‘十月五日死于空袭’。连地址都没写。老实说吧,那地方就在寒舍转角,坎普顿山丘上那些大宅子之一。 [点击阅读]
清洁女工之死
作者:佚名
章节:27 人气:0
摘要:赫尔克里-波洛从维拉饭店出来,迈步朝索霍区走去。他竖起大衣领护住他的脖子,他这样做,与其说是一种需要,不如说是处于谨慎,因为这时的夜晚并不太冷。“不过,在我这种年龄,一个人还是别冒什么风险的好。”波洛习惯这样说。他心情愉快,两眼睡意朦胧。维拉饭店的蜗牛实在是美味极了,真是一个好地方,这个地道的小餐馆,这次总算是找对了。 [点击阅读]
游思集
作者:佚名
章节:10 人气:0
摘要:1你无影无踪地向前奔涌,永恒的游思,哪里有你无形的冲击,哪里死水般的空间便会荡起粼粼的波光。是不是你的心儿神往着那在不可估量的寂寞里向你呼唤的爱人?你缠结的发辫散落,飘扬成暴风雨般的纷乱;你前行的路上火珠滚滚,犹如碎裂的项链落下串串火星,这是不是就因为你心情急迫,步履匆促?你疾行的步履把世界的尘土吻得甜美芬芳,把腐朽之物扫荡殆尽;你舞蹈的四肢是暴风雨的中心,把死亡的圣霖哗哗地摇落到生命之上, [点击阅读]
漂亮朋友
作者:佚名
章节:24 人气:0
摘要:莫泊桑是世界上数一数二的短篇小说大师,他在长篇小说创作上的成就往往因此而被湮没。其实,他在长篇小说创作上颇有建树:他继承了巴尔扎克、司汤达、福楼拜的现实主义传统,在心理描写上又开拓出新路。《漂亮朋友》就是前者的一部代表性*作品。莫泊桑从事长篇创作是在写作短篇小说之后,其时他并不满足于短篇小说所取得的成就。随着他声誉鹊起,他经常涉足上流社会,开阔了眼界,便想到从更广阔的背景上去反映社会现实。 [点击阅读]
演讲与访谈
作者:佚名
章节:6 人气:0
摘要:日本作家大江健三郎在北大附中讲演(全文)人民网日本版9月11日讯:应中国社会科学院邀请访中的日本诺贝尔文学奖获得者、中国社会科学院名誉研究员大江健三郎,10日上午来到北大附中作了题为“走的人多了,也便成了路”的讲演。其演讲全文如下:我是一个已经步入老境的日本小说家,我从内心里感到欣慰,能够有机会面对北大附中的同学们发表讲话。 [点击阅读]
火花
作者:佚名
章节:5 人气:0
摘要:“你这个白痴!”他老婆说着就把她的牌甩了下去。我急忙扭过头去,避免看见海利·德莱恩的脸;不过为什么我想避免看见那张脸,我可不能告诉你,就更不可能告诉你为什么我竟然会料想到(如果我真的料想到的话)像他这样年纪的一个显要人物会注意到我这样一个完全无足轻重的小青年遇到的事了。 [点击阅读]
灿烂千阳
作者:佚名
章节:30 人气:0
摘要:五岁那年,玛丽雅姆第一次听到“哈拉米”这个词。那天是星期四。肯定是的,因为玛丽雅姆记得那天她坐立不安、心不在焉;她只有在星期四才会这样,星期四是扎里勒到泥屋来看望她的日子。等到终于见到扎里勒的时候,玛丽雅姆将会挥舞着手臂,跑过空地上那片齐膝高的杂草;而这一刻到来之前,为了消磨时间,她爬上一张椅子,搬下她母亲的中国茶具。玛丽雅姆的母亲叫娜娜,娜娜的母亲在她两岁的时候便去世了,只给她留下这么一套茶具。 [点击阅读]
点与线
作者:佚名
章节:13 人气:0
摘要:一安田辰郎一月十三日在东京赤坂区的“小雪饭庄”宴请一位客人。客人的身份是政府某部的司长。安田辰郎经营着安田公司,买卖机械工具。这家公司这几年颇有发展。据说,生意蓬勃的原因是官家方面的订货多。所以,他时常在“小雪饭庄”招待这类身份的客人。安田时常光顾这家饭庄。在附近来说,它虽然称不上是第一流,却正因为如此,客人到了这里才不会挤得肩碰肩的,吃得心里踏实。 [点击阅读]
烟囱大厦的秘密
作者:佚名
章节:31 人气:0
摘要:“君子-周!”“啊,那木是吉米-麦克格拉吗?”佳色游览团的团员是七位面色抑郁的女士和三位汗流泱背的男士。现在,他们都相当注意地从旁观望。他们的导游凯德先生显然碰到一个老朋友了。他们都非常赞美凯德先生。他那瘦高的个儿,晒得黑黑的面孔和轻松愉快的态度,都很令人欣赏。团员当中若有争论,他总能轻轻地为他们排解,并且能够把他们哄得心平气和。现在,他遇见的这个朋友的确是一个样子很奇特的人。 [点击阅读]
烽火岛
作者:佚名
章节:15 人气:0
摘要:1827年10月18日,下午5点左右,一艘来自地中海东海岸的船正乘风前进,看来它是想赶在天黑前进入科龙海湾的维地罗港。这就是在古代荷马书中提到的奥地罗斯港口。它坐落在爱奥尼亚海和爱琴海三个锯齿状缺口中的一个里。这三个踞齿缺口把希腊南部踞成了一片法国梧桐叶的形状。古代的伯罗奔尼撒就是在这片叶状的土地上发展起来的。现代地理称其为摩里亚。 [点击阅读]